A small founding cohort is open now — India + GCCTake a seat →
Compare

Notetakers record what was said. Reality checks whether it happened.

AI notetakers capture meetings beautifully — every word, summarized and searchable. But a transcript is still a record of claims, not a check on them.

Knowing exactly what someone said “is done” doesn't tell you whether it's done. That gap is the whole point of reality reporting.

What a notetaker does and doesn't do

It captures and recalls what was said — invaluable for memory and search. What it can't do is reconcile those statements against reality: it will faithfully record “the migration is done” whether or not the migration is actually done.

What reality reporting adds

It takes the claims — from meetings, chat, anywhere — and checks them against what the systems show, surfacing where they disagree. Notes tell you what was promised; reality reporting tells you whether the promise held.

Frequently asked

Do we still need a notetaker?

They solve different problems. A notetaker is great for recall; reality reporting is for verification. Many teams want both — the record and the check on it.

Stop being the reality check.

A small founding cohort — India + GCC. A direct line to the founder.

Request early access